First, the good news: the bill increases funding for nutrition programs like food stamps and school lunch assistance that desperately need more funding. So yay! It's a good thing, too, because the 35.5 million Americans who live in food insecure households (households where there isn't always enough money to meet basic food needs) are going to be hit especially hard by rising food prices.
So here's the part that doesn't make any sense: why do the same people who realize it's important to increase funding for food stamps also think it's a good idea to increase subsidies to farmers who are turning record profits? The bill passed by Congress would provide subsidies to farmers who make up to $2.5 million dollars per year. President Bush proposed that the cutoff level be decreased to $200,000. While I am loathe to agree with Bush about anything, I have to say that even without knowing much about economics, the $2.5 million cutoff is absurd. It just doesn't make sense to funnel taxpayer money to big agribusinesses when food prices are so high, right?
It occurred to me that it was possible that farmers aren't the ones benefiting from high food prices. Maybe it's the companies who transport the food, or maybe it's the oil companies making a killing on the gas being used to truck produce around the country. After all, gas prices are up too. So I did a little more investigation, and this is what I found:
- America's net farm income is projected to be about $92 billion in 2008, which is 51% higher than the ten year average; and
- crop receipts are valued 21% higher than last year
No comments:
Post a Comment